Tibet’s Transition to the Modern World

In the 9th chapter of The Tibetans, Matthew Kapstein describes the recent history of Tibet, as they transitioned from an essentially autonomous state to one occupied and controlled by Communist China. He especially touches upon the loss of religious freedom and culture that Tibet is experiencing, due to strict Chinese rule.

First, Kapstein describes how Tibet was in a period of pseudo-turmoil right before the People’s Republic of China absorbed Tibet into their country in 1951. This period of uncertainty began when the Thirteenth Dalai Lama died in December 1933. The Dalai Lama is the head of the Tibetan state, and as his successor had not yet been found, it was unclear who would rule the region. In the interim that they were searching for the Fourteenth Dalai Lama, the government decided that power “would be shared by a lama serving as regent… and a lay chief minister.” (271) The Thirteenth Dalai Lama’s nephew, Langdün, was selected for the lay chief minister position, and Reting Rinpoché would serve as the regent. Much more occurred at this time, as there were others in consideration to rule the government, controversies surrounding Reting which inspired a coup d’état by his supporters, and other power struggles in Tibet, making the region unstable and unprepared for the Chinese invasion.

Although Tibet was considered an autonomous region since the fall of the Manchu dynasty, when Chiang Kai-shek and the Guomindang government entered power, they considered re-absorbing Tibet under Chinese control. Communists, led my Mao Zedong, challenged the Guomindang government and a power struggle in China erupted. Even though they were fighting, “the need to restore Tibet to the motherland was in fact one of the few things that the Communists and the Guomindang seemed to agree about.” (273) When Mao Zedong defeated Chiang Kai-shek, taking control of Tibet was thus on his agenda. The Communist victory in China paired with the internal turmoil in Tibet created perfect conditions for the Chinese to occupy the region, as a divided Tibet stood no chance in defending itself about the new, powerful People’s Republic of China.

The Chinese exerted their control on the Tibetans very gradually, initially only holding negotiations and promising that existing systems in Tibet would remain unchanged. “Mao wished to avoid a prolonged conflict and urged instead Tibet’s “peaceful liberation.” (280) After some negotiations, there was some initial military action to ensure that the Tibetan army was immobilized; however they “did not push on with an actual invasion of Tibet. Their intention was just to make it clear to the Tibetans that they could not expect to resist” and that they would be under Chinese control. (280) Some of the initial promises that the Chinese made to the Tibetans included that “…the existing political system and military will not be changed…All members of the religious bodies of all classes, government officials, and headmen will perform their duties as usual… The PLA… will respect the religion and customs and habits of the Tibetan people.” (280) The Chinese government issued these words in a policy statement after the invasion, and later presented the Tibetans with the 17-Point Agreement, reinforcing these promises that they made but also confirming their control over Tibet. In Point 7, religious freedom was again promised. The Tibetans agreed, for they had few other options.

Once Tibet was officially a part of the People’s Republic of China again, things began to change. The promises that the Chinese made ensuring rights for the Tibetans began to break. The Chinese started to institute reforms to make Tibet more resemble the Communist empire that they were building and they attempted to rearrange Tibetan power structures. Leaders of Tibet became fearful of Chinese rule and many fled the country, including the head of the state, the Fourteenth Dalai Lama.

The greatest promise that the Chinese government failed to keep was their guarantee of religious freedom. The Chinese became stricter in their toleration of free religious practice, which affected many Buddhist monks and nuns, forcing many to leave their monasteries and nunneries. The Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976 further worsened the situation. During this period, “all but a few of the thousands of Tibetan temples and monasteries were razed, their artistic treasures and libraries destroyed or plundered. Tens of thousands of monks and nuns, together with what remained of the aristocracy and the middle-class peasantry as well, were forced to undergo “reeducation.”” (290) Buddhism and religious practice were staples of Tibetan culture, the Chinese essentially took away their identity.

Once the Cultural Revolution ended, conditions became slightly better for Tibetans, in terms of religious freedoms, as some monasteries were rebuilt and people were allowed to more freely practice Buddhism. However, Tibet in no way has complete religious freedom, as they once did before. The Dalai Lama is still in exile and people are penalized for devotion to him. The nation is still not independent and their struggle for autonomy continues.

Something that I found very interesting in the chapter was the lack of international support that Tibet received in their struggle with China. Unfortunately the Chinese invasion and occupation occurred just as the Korean War was beginning and as India was in a dispute with Pakistan over Kashmir. The countries that might have offered aid and support were preoccupied, and thus Tibet remained vulnerable against the Chinese.

When the United States did start giving support to Tibet in the 1950’s through the late 1960’s, they really only did so for their containment policy. The United States was not truly helping Tibet in their fight for freedom, but using them as “pawns in a much larger game.” (286) When the containment policy ended and Nixon and Kissinger “embarked upon the normalization of relations with China in 1971,” support for Tibet was severed. I was bothered by the United States’ selfishness and want to know what others think about their role in the struggle.

Although I didn’t go in depth in my summary of the chaos occurring in Tibet, I was shocked by the internal strife before the occupation. I had always considered Tibet to be a region of peaceful monks, but obviously there are more complex power systems and struggles that exist. I would be curious to know what others thought of this.

In class, we have been talking a lot about the spread of Buddhism by different individuals. This reading suggests that the Dalai Lama’s absence from Tibet and role in the international world as he advocates for Tibet has helped spread the religion even more. Has anyone considered how Buddhism would have spread if the Dalai Lama were not exiled and this conflict did not exist? What is the conflicts role in how Tibetan Buddhism has infiltrated the Western world?





Tibet & China: Then and Now

In the ninth chapter of the Matthew Kapstein’s book “Tibet in the Modern World,” he discusses in detail the great divide between China and Tibet and the civil unrest that Tibet faced as a result. Kapstein explains how the “interpretation of this history is still very sharply contested, even where there is consensus regarding what actually took place,” (Kapstein, 269). This is important to note because it indicates the multitude of sides to this particular part of history which makes it difficult to decipher the actual truth. I however found that Kapstein did an excellent job of profiling the history in an unbiased and truthful manner.

Kapstein begins by depicting how the widespread perspective of the United Sates and Western Europe of what took place between China and Tibet was that the “brutal machinery of Chinese communism invaded an independent, peace-loving land, and has since been determined to eradicate any trace of Tibetan cultural and religious traditions in China,” (269). Kapstein further explains how in this same perspective, though Tibet has continually faced hardship in recent decades, they still strive to “preserve” their “enlightened, spiritual civilization against all odds.” (269) Kapstein adds that of course the Chinese perspective is completely opposite. In China’s view, Tibet has “for centuries been part of China and the Tibetans now enjoy unprecedented liberty and prosperity,” (269). Kapstein goes on to tell how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) feels that this liberty and prosperity is in great contrast to what the Tibetan people experienced under the Dalai Lama’s rule. The CCP’s view is that the Dalai Lama is actually the source of divide, trying to split China apart by supporting Tibet’s independence.

Though Kapstein’s summary of what takes place between China and Tibet is a shortened version of all that happened, I can’t possibly summarize all that he does. So instead I have chosen a few of the main events that took place surrounding Tibet’s relations with China in order to give a decent scope of the all that is explained in the chapter. The Thirteenth Dalai Lama died in December of 1933, which marks the beginning of all that ensued. His death left Tibet in a sort of “vacuum” state, especially since the government had not found a proper successor to take the Dalai Lama’s place (270). During this period Tibet faced much conflict within itself about who should rise to power and how. The internal power struggles Tibet faced at this time left it weak to outside forces, and China saw this as an opportunity to reclaim Tibet.

Tibet had been technically independent from China ever since the Manchu dynasty lost power. However, as Kapstein puts it, “Chinese leadership never accepted this sate of affairs.” As a result General Musong was sent to Lhasa by the Guomindang government. Even though they presented it as a show of condolence in the wake of the Dalai Lama’s death, it was really a means to “open negotiations regarding Tibet’s status vis-à-vis China.” (273) Kapstein further writes how the Guomindang and Communists both agreed that Tibet was rightfully a part of China. Those in power in the Tibetan government were skeptical of negotiating with China, yet at the same time were also worried to completely end discussions with the Guomindang representatives. The Tibetan leaders knew that at some point soon the issue would need to be dealt with and therefore tried to maintain an unstrained relationship.

Meanwhile, the search for a new Dalai Lama was underway. A new Lama was found in a place that was not part of political Tibet, also under the control of the Chinese Muslim warlord, Ma, Bufang. After debate about being able to bring the boy they’d found from his home for further study to see if he was the Dalai Lama they’d been searching for, the Guomindang government assisted in getting Ma to allow the child to leave under certain “conditions so as to secure a role for China in the new Dalai Lama’s recognition and installation: the director of the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission was to participate in the ceremonies in Lhasa.” (275)

A multitude of events followed that presented civil unrest: a coup d’état took place lead by Reting, the appointed regent. Although that attempt failed, this set-off violent conflict between the two sides. A rebellion also took place at Reting’s monastery some time later. It was after these events, which the Dalai Lama found to be “deeply disturbing,” that the Dalai Lama truly realized the turmoil of the political system he was being “raised to rule.” (278). It was around this time that Mao Zedong claimed his victory in China. Mao’s “intention” became to “ ‘liberate’ ” the Tibetan people from the “grips of imperialism, which they found puzzling as no imperialists were known to be active in Tibet at the time.” (279) At first, the Chinese, made it clear that they wanted this transition to be peaceful, and they didn’t begin with an invasion. Instead they just wanted to make it clear that the Tibetans simply could not resist against China’s immense force. Negotiations between sides therefore commenced. An agreement was formed that encompassed the “17-Point Agreement,” which essentially established that although Tibet would return as a part of China, the Chinese government would respect and allow Tibet to uphold its cultural and political system. In light of this, the Dalai Lama’s advisers motivated him to make his return to Lhasa as well as publically accept the 17-Point agreement, after being in exile for some time.

However, the 17-Point agreement was highly controversial. Though much ensued following this, the essence of it all was that the Dalai Lama returned to Tibet, and following that, the United States became involved as support for Tibet. This was until Nixon and Kissinger wanted to ease tension with China and when aiding Tibet was no longer in their personal interest they ceased US presence in Tibet. Following this, the Dalai Lama, now 25-years-old, was thought to be in danger due to “declarations of oracles as well as astrological indications.” (287) Therefore, when the Dalai Lama was invited to a musical concert that was going to be held at Chinese military headquarters, the news spread through the Tibetan people like wildfire. Rumors began that this concert was to be the Dalai Lama’s doom, and that it was secretly an elaborate assassination or kidnapping. Though there was no “factual evidence,” that this was true, a “spontaneous demonstration of thousands” began “during which one leading Tibetan official was stoned and another, a prominent monk…was beaten to death,” (277-288). As a result of the protests, the Dalai Lama ended up cancelling his plan to attend the concert in light of all that was taking place. Demonstrations continued, and “disturbances” took place throughout the country (288). An oracle pronounced the Dalai Lama was no longer safe in Tibet, and so, as a result he fled from Tibet, arriving in South India. Though many events took place in much more detail than I will describe, the end result was that China lost its trust in the Dalai Lama and his ability to negotiate. With the Cultural Revolution in China at its peak, it was time for Tibetan traditional culture to take a massive hit. Kapstein illustrates this time as follows:

…all but a few of the thousands of Tibetan temples and monasteries were razed,     their artistic treasures and libraries destroyed or plundered. Tens of thousands of          monks and nuns, together with what remained of the aristocracy and the middle-class peasantry as well, were forced to undergo “reeducation.” Many thus perished under extraordinarily harsh conditions, or suffered prolonged maltreatment in prison. (289-290)

Furthermore, a Tibetan community had formed in India, the Dalai Lama at its forefront. Refugee camps were formed in parts of India, with the support of the Indian government. During this time, several major monasteries were able to reestablish themselves,” as well as making it a “priority,” now more than ever, to educate monks (290). Kapstein concluded by explaining that the “Dalai Lama himself emerged as a spiritual leader of international renown, struggling to use him prominence to call the world’s attention to his nation’s predicament” (290).

When I read the article, I was incredibly intrigued by the detail Kapstein was able to give. I had known generally about the Tibetan-Chinese conflict but I had no idea of the intricacy of it its complexity. I was really fascinated by the Dalai Lama’s role throughout. I really found it interesting how, at the end of everything he became an outspoken figure for what his people were facing, as well as a respected figure all over the world. Even though some of his decisions became catalysts for added conflict, he was always respected by the Tibetan people. I also found the relationship between the Dalai Lama and his people and vice versa to be really interesting because it seems to truly be one of epic care and compassion. Tibetan culture is so unique that I feel like this is part of why the Tibetan people have such an immense bond.

As Kapstein continues until the end of the article to describe the aftermath of the cultural revolution to present day, I also was interested by his discussion of re-education of children and how the Tibetan language is becoming less and less used in schools. This to me is a clear sign of China’s influence, even though the Tibetan people have fought so hard to maintain a sense of tradition. It made me really wonder what Tibetan culture will be like in the years to follow present day.

Discussion Questions are as follows:

  1. What, in your perspective, was the climax of the Chinese-Tibetan conflict and why do you think this?
  1. Do you think that there is anything that could have changed the course of events if something had gone just a bit differently?
  1. In your opinion, how do you feel about where Tibet and China stand today? What course of action do you think should be taken (if any) to try and come to some kind of compromise between the two sides?


Chögyam Trungpa and his Teachings

“Chögyam Trungpa His Life and Vision” highlights the life of Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche, Buddhist meditation master that had one of the highest statuses’ in the monastery and was a scholar, teacher, and artist. The reading describes his journey of leaving his origins in Tibet to move west to the United States to spread his Buddhist beliefs. He to “not present the spiritual path in terms of acquisition of some precise, external wisdom, but as the capacity to face our true selves as directly as possible, leaving aside social or moral conventions” (11).

Trungpa, in particular, had an unorthodox way of teaching his beliefs when he went to the west. Tibetan Buddhism was not very well known in the western culture so Trungpa idea for teaching stemmed from the idea of abandoning “exotic trappings of the lama and meet people on their own ground” (5). Trungpa started teaching in England, but did not find much success in his teachings because people found him “horribly hypocritical” (6) and expected him to behave as the stereotypical “Oriental Sage” (6). So he moved to the United States in hopes to spread his teachings.

In the United States, Trungpa tried as hard as possible to downplay his high Tibetan Buddhist status and tried more to assimilate with the cultural norms so he could better communicate with people he met. He “smoke and drank whiskey” (5) and tried as much as possible to become their friend. By becoming more personable and appealing to the American culture, he could be more respected and his teachings were well heard. He started the Rocky Mountain Dharma Center in Boulder, Colorado. This rural residential center acted as a place for his followers to live, meditate, and learn from Trungpa. His teachings spread and meditation centers across the country were set up. Trungpa asked very little of his students at first, but gradually with his laid-back attitude he was able to turn the students into the Buddhists. The students slowly asked to create more rules in the Rocky Mountain Dharma Center that allowed them to meditate more and focus on themselves. Trungpa showed that the “Buddha’s teachings were not aimed at a particular sort of person at a particular time, but at all of us, here and now” (16).

While his teachings emphasized the being present and in the moment one concept in particular inhibited people from doing this. The inhibitor was spiritual materialism. Trungpa characterized spiritual materialism as being “consciously centered on the material world and related preoccupations” (19). He stated that spiritual materialism had three lords. The Lord of Form consisted of the efforts to gain comfort and security. The Lord of Speech is using intellect to control the universe better and the Lord of Mind “perverts the spiritual desire to become more conscious and aware” (20). To combat the pressures of spiritual materialism, Trungpa stated that meditation was the best way to fight these feelings. He encouraged meditation because it encouraged people “not learn to be ‘right,’ but instead to be ever more open to what is” (25).

I really enjoyed this reading because it is a different approach to the religion from what we have seen from previous readings. I think it’s very intriguing that a man left the high status in Tibet to come teach in the United States. Although his approach is unorthodox, it definitely seemed to work. In order for people to understand what you are trying to teach them it is best to be on the same level as them as an equal to seem more relatable and trustworthy. While the spreading of the teachings did not come immediately, Trungpa’s approach of giving them the base of Tibetan Buddhism then letting the people run with it and develop norms on their own proved to make the transition into being a Buddhist feel more natural and less forced. In other religions such as Christianity, people attend church and read the bible in a very structured environment. Having less structure allows for more interpretation and increases the true fellowship and following that Trungpa was trying to build.

Unlike other readings, we can view this reading from our own perspective because it seems more familiar to us. I am wondering if this way of teaching Tibetan Buddhism was controversial at all in Tibet or if they would take this same stripped down and raw approach. How might the Tibetan’s view Trunga’s teachings? Do you think it is easier to gain followers in a place completely foreign to beliefs like the United States or a place with a little more familiarity of the religion? With this kind of teaching approach do you think there are gender hierarchies like the Buddhist nuns and monks? How might Trungpa and other followers view the Buddhist concepts the cycle of samsara and the idea of merit? Both samsara and merit are considered to be spiritual materialism in a way because it is a goal focused on a physical destination or qualitative goal. Are these concepts better than focusing on oneself and who one really is?

The Divine Madman

In order to get a brief summary of the texts, one may look no further than the titles of the two stories. Both titles aptly sum up the important events that occur in the stories. The first story is entitled How Drupka Kunley bound the Demons of Bhutan and directed the Aged of that Land to the Path of Liberation. This story chronicles Drupka Kunley’s adventures as he defeats various demons of Bhutan. An enlightened Lama, Kunley is visited in a dream by a goddess who tells him to travel to Bhutan to fulfill a prophecy that “foretold the conversion” (121) of the people living there. On his way to Bhutan, Kunley is faced with a variety of demons, all of which he defeats with his penis (also called his Flaming Thunderbolt of Wisdom). In addition to converting all of the demons to the way of the Buddha, Kunley also assists many elderly people out of Samsara. Using many unconventional techniques such as obscene prayers, Kunley helps many of Bhutan’s aged reach enlightenment. In this way, Kunley fulfills the prophecy initially stated in the beginning of the story – he binds many demons and sets many of the elderly on the path to liberation.

The second story is called How Drupka Kunley instructed his Consorts in the Southern Valley. In this story, Kunley teaches the people of the Southern Valley about sexual practices, worship, and other tenants by which one should live. Kunley mostly uses his sexual advances as ways to instruct the people about his various truths. This is exemplified by many of the situations Kunley finds himself in, specifically in the sex that Kunley has with many maidens. Kunely eventually instructs all the people of the Southern Valley about ethics, sex, and worship.

While reading these texts, it is important to remember the title of the work where these stories come from: The Divine Madman. Through this title, one can see that there is acknowledgement of Kunley’s madness despite his divinity. These stories might have been told in order to highlight that the divine manifest themselves in a variety of ways; although one may seem insane, they could harbor some spiritual qualities. Additionally, these stories may have instructed people about various teaching of the Buddha in a clear, easy to understand fashion. By using the most basic human drive – sex – the stories can be relatable to everyone, thus making them easier to understand.

I did have a few questions while reading the stories. Obviously, sexuality is a huge part of both texts and the images used to describe male and female sex organs differed greatly. Kunley’s penis is constantly described as a mighty and powerful object that can fell demons, whereas the few descriptions of female vaginas describe them as gaping and weak. I wonder if these kind of descriptions contributed to the idea that women are beneath men. Additionally, Kunley describes women as constantly wanting sex and they always lust after a man. I thought this seemed pretty contradictory, since Kunley himself states that he “never tires of girls” (140). Throughout the stories, it seemed as if women’s lust for sex was a negative thing, whereas Kunley’s carnal desires were used as instructive tools. Where did this idea come from? Are stories such as these powerful enough to dilute the thinking of a whole community?

Questioning the Intention of ‘The Divine Madman’

In Keith Dowman’s “The Divine Madman: The Sublime life and Songs of Drukpa Kunley,” he re-tells the legend and subsequent teachings of Lama, Drukpa Kunley, also referred to as the “Master of Truth, Lord of Beings, Drukpa Kunga Legpa,” (Dowman, 119). A multitude of legends are depicted in this particular excerpt of Dowman’s book ranging from how Kunley began his mythic journey as well as how he displayed his powers. Though there were too many stories to summarize in full here, I will do my best to describe a few to give the best sense of Kunley’s character. His spiritual path began when he had a dream while staying at “Lady Semzanngmo’s house in Nangkaste,” (119). In his dream he saw “a woman dressed in a yellow skirt, and holding a flaming sword,” (119). She spoke to him:

‘Drukpa Kunley, it is time that you fulfilled the prophecy that foretold the               conversion of the people of Bhutan, and the magical purification of that land. In            Bhutan you will establish a family which will serve the Drukpa Tradition to great advantage in the future. You must shoot an arrow to the south early in the morning as a harbinger of your coming.’ So saying, she disappeared, and Kunley awoke. (119)

Kunley discerns this dream as a divine message from the “Smoky Goddess” and thus follows the goddess’s instructions (119). The arrow travels far making a sound that the people think is a “dragon roaring,” but the children discern as Kunley’s arrow (119). The arrow lands in the home of a young couple whom become important much later in Kunley’s legend. The stories that follow all detail exactly what the chapter-head foretells. Essentially, they are all tales of how Kunley defeats demons that terrorize the lands as well as how he helps elderly women in their stages of death. The powers of which Kunley utilizes to defeat the demons derive from his erect penis, also referred to as his “flaming thunderbolt of wisdom.” (120) He uses his “thunderbolt” to hit the demons in the mouth and smash their teeth. In another interaction with a demoness, he unrolls his penis’ foreskin and covers the demoness with it, “render[ing] her completely helpless” (121). In yet another, a demoness, becomes “petrified,” unable to bear the sight of his “magical tower” (128). All the demons of which he interacts with either become bound to Kunley to do his biddings or become imprisoned in some natural formation.

I was completely struck when the first story of Kunley heavily involved his erect penis began because I found it so utterly jarring in comparison to other Buddhist texts we have read. I also found it quite a comment on the importance of being a male in society. To me, it almost seemed to edge on propaganda for how having a penis (or being male) is what matters in society. Kunley is essentially teaching how one can use masculinity to ward off evil as a weapon, as he does in the story. There is also a portion of the legend where after Kunley has smashed in a demon’s teeth, the demon runs to a nun sitting in deep meditation to ask for her advice (126). The nun explains that the demon has been hit by a “magical device” and that the kind of wound never heals. She opens her legs and reveals that the “wound” between her legs was made by the same weapon, and that it will never heal (126). The demon touches her “wound” or vagina, and smells his finger, complaining of its “putrid” smell. He exclaims, “I suppose mine will go the same way,” (127). Here, a clear comment on being a woman in Buddhist culture is being made. Essentially that as a woman one is wounded from the beginning. Unlike the penis, or as is described in the story as a “thunderbolt of wisdom,” one should be ashamed and wary of the vagina as it is a wound that cannot be healed. That like a wound, it is rotted and that is why the smell is so “putrid.” (127) This is in great contrast to the wisdom and great power of Kunley’s sexual organ which is to practically be worshipped.

The other portion of the first half of the text is about his dealings with old women near death. In the first story, in his travels Kunley passes a woman who is praying to him to receive his blessing (121). He reveals his identity to her, and she invites him to stay with her for food and ‘chung’ (a kind of alcohol) (122). She invites some of her friends, who are also older women to “pay their respects.” (122) To prove her faith to Kunley, she explains that she would give him her life (122). Kunley, fully intoxicated with chung, as well as knowing that she was to die that night anyways, shoots her with his bow and arrow. Due to this action, all the people in the town think he is a fraud, and are greatly angered. Kunley takes the old woman’s corpse to a storeroom and locks it inside. He promises to return in seven days, and for no one to open the storeroom before his return. However, on the sixth day, the old woman’s son returns home and hears what has happened. He is completely appalled by what he’s heard, and breaks open the storeroom. To the son’s great surprise he finds a pleaseant odor wafting out of the storeroom and the corpse transformed into a rainbow of light except for the “big toe on the right foot.” (123) Kunley returns at this moment and bites the ear of the woman’s son because he had opened the door too early. The son praised to Lama with “thanksgiving and devotion,” (123). The Lama explains that the son’s ‘thanks’ is not important but the fact that his mother was living in a “pure Buddha Land” now was what truly mattered (123). These kinds of stories continue all along the same theme of helping the elderly find peace in death. In one story he releases a dead person from the cycle of Samsara after bringing her back to life (124).

Leading up to the second half of the text, the reader gets the first look at Kunley’s escapades with girls. At one point when he finally reaches the home where his arrow landed, he becomes infatuated with the wife of the man of the house and wants to take her for his own (129). The man of the house tries to stab Kunley but fails as Kunley uses his powers to block his aim. The man of the house realizes Kunley is a Lama of great power and immediately offers the Lama his wife as well as his house to stay (129). The second part of the text is titled, “How Drukpa Kunley Instructed his Consorts in the Southern Valleys” (137). This part of the text describes Kunley’s ability to seduce many young virgins all of whom he promises to return to at different moments in time.

There is also a major moment in the text where the consorts and patrons of Bhutan ask him to give a “discourse upon the Buddhas’ Teaching,” (138). They ask him to make it understandable to common people but also for the teaching to have a “profound inner meaning.” (138) It is in these teachings that for me, raised the most questions as well as the most comments. Kunley presents himself as a highly powerful, highly sexualized being. His most powerful weapon is his penis and he uses it to both seduce virgins as well as to enslave demons. He makes comments on gender in his teachings that I found quite interesting in light of what we have learned previously about Buddhism. Sex is not something that I thought was forefront in Buddhist teachings, but in Kunley’s tales it is a huge part of his identity. Each teaching is riddled with gender binaries. What we’ve read about the subordination of nuns in Buddhist tradition was suddenly much clearer. One line is as follows: “Kunely never tires of girls, Monks never tire of wealth, Girls never tire of sex,” (140). The meaning here is clear: Kunley values sex, and “never tires” of his sexual escapades. He also dictates that Monks value wealth, which is interesting because much of Buddhist teaching is avoiding greed, and yet he explicitly notes that Monks value this. Additionally, he stereotypes and categorizes girls as to be used for sex by explaining that they “never tire,” (140). He also describes how “The sign of a rich man is a tight fist, The sign of an old man is a tight mind, The sign of a nun is a tight vagina” (139) His comment on gender here seems to allude to the fact that a nun’s virginity is her value and her power, and that is why she is a nun. I was extremely bothered by his attitude throughout the story. Other than his heroic dealings with demons, his demeanor was rude and arrogant. To me he came across as a figure I would be turned off by in worship, not one to glorify. In many of his dealings he is entitled as well as often highly intoxicated with chung, which seems to be used as an excuse for his behavior at times. I found Kunley’s teachings highly problematic. On the one hand I found it beautiful that he released the elderly women from the cycle from Samsara and the imagery of rainbows as well as the story of giving life to a corpse were truly engaging. However, they were in great contrast to his teachings on sex as well as a man and woman’s place in society which to me represented a facet of Buddhist tradition that is not well known or publicized.

Discussion Questions:

In scrutinizing his teachings, I would love to know how the rest of the class felt about the emphasis of Kunley’s “Thunderbolt of Wisdom” as such a main part of his legend. Specifically what role this statement would have on the followers of the religion and what impact it may have had on nuns as well as women in Buddhist culture.

Another question I would pose would be to discuss the significance of the people of whom he released from samsara being elderly women?

Lastly, I wanted to pose the question of why these legends were written? Who do you believe they were written for and what purpose would they serve?